Whereas synthetic intelligence has been lauded the world over for its doubtlessly transformative impact on, properly, just about everything, state legislators throughout the nation have been concerned about its potential for harm, particularly within the office.
New State Office Discrimination Legal guidelines
In Could 2024, Colorado lawmakers permitted SB 205, which proposed the nation’s first complete legislation to broadly regulate AI and shield residents and workers from algorithmic discrimination.
The invoice, which Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (D) signed the identical month, permits the state’s lawyer normal to implement penalties in opposition to developers or deployers of high-risk AI systems (including employers) who fail to fulfill statutory obligations to ward in opposition to their AI unlawfully treating anyone differently on the premise of their age, race or incapacity, amongst different protected traits.
In June 2024, the Illinois legislature permitted HB 3773, which stipulated that employers within the Prairie State might not use AI that considers an applicant’s race or zip code to make hiring selections.
Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D) signed that measure into legislation in August.
This previous February, the Virginia legislature permitted HB 2094, one other complete invoice mandating how builders and deployers deal with AI. Nonetheless, on March 24, Virgina Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) vetoed the measure.
Lawyer Elias Kahn, senior product supervisor for labor and employment, tax, federal authorities and worker advantages and government compensation for the Practical Guidance staff at LexisNexis®, mentioned he suspects extra states will go laws in 2025 to manage AI discrimination in employment as a result of “there may be a lot potential for AI instruments to discriminate in opposition to job candidates and workers.”
AI Discrimination in Employment Scorching Subject in Statehouses
To date this 12 months, lawmakers in not less than 20 states have thought of laws that addresses synthetic intelligence-related discrimination within the office, in keeping with the LexisNexis® State Internet® legislative monitoring system.
Employers Ought to Audit Their AI Instruments to Keep away from Legal responsibility
New York Metropolis grew to become the primary main jurisdiction to manage AI discrimination within the office, with the passage of Local Law 144 in 2021. The legislation went into impact on July 5, 2023.
That specific legislation applies solely to selections concerning hiring and promotion, not to other employment-related decisions like compensation and termination. However Kahn mentioned with increasingly more employers turning to AI know-how, companies must be cautious concerning the AI instruments they use for any employment perform.
“Employers are particularly uncovered to potential excessive legal responsibility when office AI instruments discriminate in opposition to many job candidates or workers,” he mentioned. “This will result in pricey class and/or collective motion litigation.”
Litigation Relating to AI Office Instruments
For instance, in September 2023, three corporations that present English-language tutoring to Chinese language college students had to pay $365,000 to settle an employment discrimination lawsuit. In keeping with the swimsuit introduced by the U.S. Equal Employment Alternative Fee, the businesses used software program that mechanically rejected job candidates based mostly on their age, leading to greater than 200 rejections of certified folks in the USA.
In one other instance, the human sources know-how firm Workday is at present battling a potentially precedent-setting class-action lawsuit alleging that its applicant screening software program discriminates based mostly on race, age and disability.
In September 2024, the Nationwide Regulation Evaluate wrote that the case “might function a wake-up for different AI ‘use circumstances’ past simply HR,” with a federal courtroom in California having held that an employer’s use of Workday’s software program may create a direct legal responsibility to Workday, not simply the employer.
The case, which is ongoing, “serves as a reminder that the authorized panorama surrounding AI is evolving, and with it, the duties of all events concerned,” the legislation journal wrote.
For extra info on latest federal AI circumstances, together with AI employment litigations, see the Sensible Steerage Artificial Intelligence: Federal Litigation Tracker.
Avoiding Litigation Relating to AI Office Instruments
To keep away from authorized entanglements, Kahn recommends that companies rigorously evaluation any AI instruments they use for employment features, doubtlessly turning to each technical and employment legislation specialists for unbiased audits to make sure they aren’t biased or in any other case doubtlessly violating relevant employment legal guidelines.
In actual fact, he really useful that companies do that even when their jurisdiction has no new AI-specific discrimination legislation due to the fast adoption of AI office instruments and the potential for legal responsibility beneath current non-AI-specific employment legal guidelines.
“The damages can get very excessive in conventional discrimination and different employment legislation circumstances,” Kahn mentioned.
Extra Office AI Legislative Motion Anticipated This 12 months
Proposals to manage AI discrimination failed in California, New York and on the federal degree in 2024. However Kahn mentioned companies shouldn’t take that to imply legislative curiosity in AI office discrimination is waning.
Certainly, the legislation agency Fisher Phillips, which has been monitoring AI discrimination laws over a number of posts to its web site, said in early 2025 that it expects “to see California and New York to be among the many states on the forefront” of AI discrimination laws this 12 months.
“Over 30 states have fashioned AI committees or taskforces which have begun issuing studies and proposals,” the agency wrote, “lots of which can flip into proposed laws.”
AI laws is such a excessive precedence for the Sensible Steerage staff at LexisNexis that it’s monitoring proposals on the federal and state ranges in 2025 and has developed a survey on enacted state laws, including AI employment laws. Kahn suspects the staff should be continuously replace these supplies all through 2025 as state legislators proceed to dig into the problem.
“I don’t have a crystal ball, however there’s a powerful likelihood we’ll see extra of those state AI office discrimination legal guidelines go in 2025,” he mentioned.
—By SNCJ Correspondent BRIAN JOSEPH
Visit our webpage to attach with a LexisNexis® State Internet® consultant and find out how the State Internet legislative and regulatory monitoring service may also help you determine, monitor, analyze and report on related legislative and regulatory developments.
