Louisiana parish officers who threatened to arrest and imprison an environmental activist as she tried to talk throughout a public assembly didn’t violate her proper to freedom of speech, a unanimous civil jury dominated Wednesday.
Pleasure Banner had sought greater than $2 million in damages from two St. John the Baptist parish officers — Parish President Jaclyn Hotard and councilmember Michael Wright — who she mentioned blocked her from elevating allegations of corruption tied to industrial improvement at a public assembly. Whereas Banner’s attorneys mentioned the case had necessary implications for shielding outspoken residents from authorities censorship, attorneys representing the parish mentioned they had been mannequin officers attempting to curtail disruption and preserve the assembly on observe.
The case is a part of a broader collection of disputes playing out in courts and public hearings between grassroots group teams and Louisiana officers over industrial growth within the 85-mile (136-kilometer) chemical hall between Baton Rouge and New Orleans, usually referred to by environmental activists as “Most cancers Alley” due to its excessive pollution levels.
Banner, co-founder of the environmental and racial justice group The Descendants Mission, gained a nationwide status preventing in opposition to an $800 million grain terminal slated for her predominantly Black group in St. John the Baptist parish. The project was later aborted.
In a November 2023 parish council assembly, Banner sought to oppose an agenda merchandise launched by Hotard to make use of taxpayer funds for a lawyer to defend parish officers from ethics complaints. The state ethics board had launched an investigation after Banner filed a grievance stating that Hotard’s mother-in-law, Darla Gaudet, owned a marine transport firm that owned land close to the proposed web site for the grain terminal.
As Banner started to debate these issues in the course of the public remark interval, councilmember Michael Wright repeatedly banged his gavel and each he and Hotard informed Banner she was not talking on subject as she made her remarks.
Wright then quoted from an out of date legislation below which anybody who publicly shared testimony given to a state ethics board investigation may very well be topic to at least one yr of imprisonment. A federal decide deemed the legislation unconstitutional years in the past.
“After I heard the phrases imprisonment and misdemeanor, I assumed, ‘That’s it, I’m going to jail, I’ve messed every part up, my enterprise goes to be ruined, my title goes to be ruined.’ I used to be terrified and shocked,” Banner later testified.
Ike Spears, the parish officers’ lawyer, famous that they’d additionally interrupted and instructed to remain on subject different members of the general public who spoke in the course of the public remark interval. He described Banner as a “disruptive citizen” striving to grow to be a “social media influencer” and garner media consideration from the litigation.
“She needs us to reward this conduct with $2 million plus,” Spears informed jurors.
Banner’s lawyer William Most countered that her meant feedback on the public assembly had been “very important” to informing the parish about Hotard’s potential conflicts of curiosity.
“Pleasure Banner was handled in another way than anybody else: She was the one individual threatened with arrest and she or he was additionally the one one to lift the difficulty of Hotard’s household enterprise pursuits,” Most mentioned. “She was straight on subject.”
Hotard additionally used vitriolic language to explain Banner, together with fantasizing about strangling her, in textual content messages to her mother-in-law that had been launched as proof. Most mentioned the messages indicated that Hotard had a private motivation to close down Banner’s participation in a public assembly.
The state ethics board dominated final yr that Hotard had not violated state ethics legal guidelines.
But Hotard’s mother-in-law later revealed throughout a deposition for Banner’s lawsuit that Hotard’s husband is a beneficiary of a belief that owned land overlapping with the deliberate railroad route main into the proposed grain terminal.
Spears acknowledged that Hotard would “most likely” personally profit from the grain terminal’s approval. However he mentioned elevated tax income and good-paying jobs had been the parish president’s driving motivation in supporting the challenge.
Hotard and Wright mentioned in emailed statements to The Related Press that they noticed the jury’s verdict as a rejection of “frivolous” lawsuits and a optimistic signal for future enterprise funding of their parish.
“These lawsuits usually are not about equity or accountability,” Hotard mentioned. “They’re about leveraging the authorized system for private acquire and selling self-interest.”
Juror Cam Owen mentioned he was able to vote in Banner’s favor following closing arguments. He modified his thoughts — and got here to tears throughout deliberations — after carefully reviewing the information and video footage of the general public assembly, which he described because the “deciding issue” for the jury. Owen mentioned jurors calculated the period of time Banner was in a position to converse and concluded she was in a position to specific most of her viewpoint.
“On the finish of the day, you already know, they did attempt to cease her, however she did truly say what she needed to say,” Owen mentioned.
The jury additionally dominated that the parish had not violated Louisiana’s open conferences legislation.
Banner mentioned she had no regrets about bringing the lawsuit and mentioned it uncovered the parish president’s hidden monetary pursuits.
“The aim of this case was for transparency,” Banner mentioned. “I believe it’s necessary to carry individuals accountable for the issues that we really feel are mistaken.”
“I hope you’ll be able to heal,” Japanese District of Louisiana Decide Nannette Jolivette Brown informed Banner and the parish officers after the decision. “This is just one a part of the method.”
Copyright 2025 Related Press. All rights reserved. This materials might not be printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Fascinated with Air pollution?
Get automated alerts for this subject.