Hawaii lawmakers this week handed a invoice supposed to assist shore up Hawaiian Electrical Co.’s credit standing regardless of sturdy opposition from Home and Senate committee chairs who helped vet the measure.
The invoice would impose a brand new payment on HECO prospects to assist pay for investments wanted to guard the general public from wildfires. However that’s not what drew criticism from Sen. Jarrett Keohokalole, chair of the Senate Commerce and Shopper Safety Committee, and Rep. Scott Matayoshi, chair of the Home Shopper Safety and Commerce Committee.
They targeted on an Eleventh-hour modification capping HECO’s legal responsibility for property injury within the occasion of future wildfires. The legal responsibility cap has all the time been a key a part of the measure, however a change made on Friday offers the Public Utilities Fee, not the Legislature, the ability to set the cap quantity and the way it will apply.
Home Vitality and Environmental Safety Committee chair Nicole Lowen mentioned it made sense to have the PUC set the legal responsibility cap via a deliberative public rulemaking course of.
“It’s not good,” Lowen mentioned. However she added, “It’s my agency perception that we’re doing one thing constructive for customers.”
However Keohokalole mentioned the a part of the invoice placing the fee in cost was “inserted within the shadows on the very finish of the session.” Earlier drafts set the cap in response to formulation decided by the Legislature.
As well as, Keohokalole mentioned, the PUC would get to resolve if the cap applies to a single wildfire or a number of fires going down over numerous years. That might imply a sequence of fires at first of the time interval might exhaust HECO’s capped quantity, leaving victims uncompensated or having to show to different alleged wrongdoers who don’t take pleasure in a legal responsibility cap.
“It’s a blatant company handout,” mentioned Keohokalole, who was one in all 5 senators who voted towards the invoice, becoming a member of Sens. Brenton Awa, Brandon Elefante, Mike Gabbard and Les Ihara.
Matayoshi echoed Keohakolole, saying the PUC’s choice to implement the cap based mostly on a time interval fairly than per fireplace probably would unduly favor “sure fireplace victims over others.”
Becoming a member of Matayoshi to vote towards the invoice within the Home have been Reps. Terez Amato, Diamond Garcia, Andrew Garrett, Gregor Ilagan, Trish La Chica, Elijah Pierick, Mahina Poepoe, Adrian Tam and Shirley Ann Templo.
Lowen acknowledged in her flooring speech that basing the cap on a time interval versus an occasion “is a professional concern.”
However she mentioned the sophisticated and unprecedented side of the problem deserves having the PUC undergo the method of making guidelines.
The invoice permits the governor to reject no matter guidelines the PUC adopts.
Not at challenge was the brand new payment on prospects. Below the invoice, HECO might borrow cash towards the charges to make use of to pay for wildfire prevention initiatives. Such securitization measures are extensively utilized by utilities and permit them to borrow cash at decrease rates of interest than they usually can.
HECO’s credit score issues are particularly acute as a result of ranking companies slashed its bond ranking after the 2023 Maui wildfires, which suggests its rates of interest can be particularly excessive — and handed on to prospects anyway.
“The securitization a part of the invoice is incredible,” Matayoshi mentioned.
This story was initially printed by Honolulu Civil Beat and distributed via a partnership with The Related Press.
Copyright 2025 Related Press. All rights reserved. This materials will not be printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Subjects
Catastrophe
Natural Disasters
Wildfire
Legislation
Hawaii
Fascinated by Disaster?
Get computerized alerts for this matter.
