As Congress Appears to Cut back Federal Spending, Medicare and Medicaid Stay Broadly Widespread, and At Least Twice as Many Folks Wish to Improve Spending Reasonably Than Reduce It | KFF

0
7
Costly GLP-1 Drugs are Rarely Covered for Weight Loss by Marketplace Plans | KFF

With the incoming Trump administration and Republican-led Congress seeking to methods to scale back federal spending, a brand new KFF Health Tracking Poll finds that the Medicare and Medicaid packages stay broadly widespread, and extra individuals favor extra spending on these packages than much less spending.

About eight in 10 People total view Medicare (82%) and Medicaid (77%) favorably. This contains majorities throughout partisans, together with most Republicans (75% view Medicare favorably and 63% view Medicaid favorably).

About half (46%) of the general public say the federal authorities doesn’t spend sufficient on Medicaid, greater than twice the share (19%) who say the federal government spends “an excessive amount of.” The hole is even bigger for Medicare, with half (51%) of the general public saying the federal government doesn’t spend sufficient in comparison with 15% who say the federal government spends an excessive amount of.

The Reasonably priced Care Act (ACA), generally known as Obamacare, additionally stays widespread, with practically two thirds (64%) of the general public holding favorable views, although with extra of a partisan divide. Most Democrats and independents maintain favorable views of the ACA, whereas about three quarters of Republicans (72%) maintain unfavorable views.

Massive majorities additionally say they’re “very” or “considerably” anxious that individuals coated by every of the three packages sooner or later received’t get the identical advantages obtainable in the present day. This contains 81% who say so about Medicare, 72% who say so about Medicaid, and 70% who say so in regards to the ACA marketplaces. Republicans are much less anxious than different partisans about Medicaid and the ACA.

Forward of President Trump’s inauguration, the ballot additionally assesses how the general public prioritizes 11 potential actions on well being that the brand new administration and Congress may take.

About six in 10 say that boosting worth transparency guidelines (61%) and limiting chemical substances within the meals provide (58%) are each a “high precedence.” This contains majorities of Republicans, independents and Democrats.

Throughout his first administration, President Trump issued federal rules establishing worth transparency necessities for hospitals and insurers, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., his choose to move the U.S. Division of Well being and Human Providers, has lengthy advocated in opposition to chemical substances in meals.

In distinction, few among the many public rank a number of different well being insurance policies related to President Trump and his allies as high priorities.

For instance, about one in seven say that decreasing federal spending on Medicaid (13%) or limiting entry to abortion (14%) is a high precedence, whereas a lot bigger shares say every of those “shouldn’t be performed” (44% and 51%, respectively). Different low-ranking priorities embrace reducing funding to varsities that require college students to get vaccinated (15%), encouraging communities to not add fluoride to their water provide (23%), and repealing and changing the ACA (27%).

Amongst different well being priorities:

  • Medicare drug worth negotiations. Greater than half (55%) of the general public say it’s a high precedence to develop the variety of prescribed drugs topic to Medicare drug worth negotiations, together with most Democrats (65%) and about half of Republicans (48%). Solely 3% say this shouldn’t be performed.
  • Regulating insurance coverage declare denials. Most individuals (55%) say extra intently regulating insurers’ selections to approve or deny claims for well being companies or prescribed drugs needs to be a high precedence. This contains most Democrats (61%) and independents (59%), together with practically half (45%) of Republicans. Total, simply 5% oppose this.
  • Enhanced ACA subsidies. A few third (32%) say that extending the expanded monetary help that helps make ACA market medical insurance reasonably priced needs to be a high precedence. This contains half of Democrats (50%) however few Republicans (16%). Solely 7% say this shouldn’t be performed.

The incoming Trump administration has established a brand new “Division of Authorities Effectivity,” or DOGE, charged with growing plans to chop federal spending and cut back rules.

Most People (73%) say that decreasing fraud and waste in authorities well being packages would result in “main” or “minor” reductions in federal spending total. This contains most Republicans (80%), independents (72%), and Democrats (68%).

On the identical time, greater than half (55%) of the general public additionally say that decreasing fraud and waste would result in reductions in the advantages that individuals obtain from authorities well being packages. Not less than half of Republicans (60%), Democrats (55%), and independents (51%) maintain this view.

Different findings embrace:

  • Many of the public say the federal government will not be spending sufficient on the prevention of continual ailments (60%) or prevention of infectious ailments and making ready for future pandemics (54%). A lot smaller shares say the federal government spends “an excessive amount of” on every of those.
  • Greater than half (57%) of the general public say they anticipate well being care to change into much less reasonably priced for his or her households over the subsequent few years. This contains most (54%) Trump voters and half (51%) of Republicans regardless of the marketing campaign’s emphasis on addressing rising prices, together with in well being care.

Designed and analyzed by public opinion researchers at KFF. The survey was performed Jan. 7-14, 2025, on-line and by phone amongst a nationally consultant pattern of 1,310 U.S. adults in English and in Spanish. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3 share factors for the total pattern. For outcomes primarily based on different subgroups, the margin of sampling error could also be greater.